Baby boomers growing up
learned of cases like the Scopes “Monkey Trial.” Clarence Darrow,
perhaps the best American lawyer of all time, made it a landmark.
Although teacher John
Thomas Scopes was convicted of teaching evolution, which is still a hot topic,
he was released on a technicality.
Ferdinando Nicola
Sacco and Bartolomeo Vanzetti were executed in 1927 for two murders committed
in South Braintree, Mass., authorities said, on behalf of anarchists.
Historians remain split over whether they were guilty.
Manning’s lawyer and
the prosecution were gave final arguments today in his preliminary hearing
but the judge, who limited the defense to two witnesses, has until mid-January
to render a verdict. And it won’t be conclusive. He could be ordered to go
through the whole thing again in a court martial.
Manning’s case is
more controversial than either, even before a verdict, for two reasons. He was not fit for such classified duty. He
demonstrated it on numerous occasions when he lost control, and even reported
himself. As a writer on disability
because of PTSD I know what it is like to contend with overwhelming forces.
The second reason is
the Army has demonstrated it is not capable of dealing with such cases. This
can be partly blamed on making it all-volunteer. Rome’s downfall was preceded
by a decision to replace draftees, indeed only those who owned property, with
mercenaries. It is all a chimera meant to allow presidents to get away with
unwanted wars.
Legally, there is a
third reason. His lengthy detention, which included the punishment of being
held in solitary, is illegal.
My view is based on
having covered military trials, murderous military fiascos, and Wikileaks
itself.
Manning, who now is being
presented as literally gaga, is accused of walking out of an Iraq base with 251,000
classified documents he had put on a DVD marked Lady Gaga.
The documents, including a
video showing what appeared to be an unjustified U.S. helicopter attack on
Baghdad civilians, reached Wikileaks which published them selectively.
Any analysis of what
happened should begin with noting American soldiers are required by military to
report war crimes.
In fact, I have witnessed
time and time again soldiers being given white glove treatment in court
martials for killings and wounding of civilians.
Pat Tillman, an NFL football star, a
volunteer, should not have died of friendly fire in Afghanistan.
In one case, a soldier
charged with others for throwing two non-combatant Iraqis in a river where one
drowned, was given a leading question. He didn’t know the man was going to drown
or he would have intervened. “I wouldn’t go that far,” he said to courtroom
laughter as I recall.
Then the defense asked why
the other man, who was a witness, was not in court or on a televideo. The Army
said they couldn’t find him.
That led to the defense
saying the AP had found him an interviewed him, which was true.
Suddenly the military
judge wanted me, then an AP reporter, to say whether this was true or not. Of
course I refused to comment. And this was something that could have been found
on Google.
The Army told me over and
over again that potential sufferers of PTSD would be stopped from deploying.
Yet history shows many were, including some who had already been deployed and
thus suffered the psychiatric wound.
A soldier-translator was
charged with cowardice, the first case since Vietnam, because he freaked out
when he witnessed the body of an Iraqi killed by the Special Forces he
accompanied. Publicity led to his discharge.
A doctor who was in charge
of dispensing medicine that led to the death of a soldier who had returned from
deployment with serious psychiatric problems. Civilians seemed just as
incompetent. An El Paso County doctor got the man’s race wrong.
Once, after listening to
the umpteenth attempt by Army commanders to convince reporters that PTSD was
not cowardice, an Army captain leaned over to me and said it was all horseshit;
these people were all cowards.
Dr. Nidal
Malik Hasan, a Virginia-born Muslim psychiatrist, killed 13 at Fort Hood. His likely behavior should
have been obvious. In World War 2, the Army tended to avoid
sending Japanese Americans to fight in the Pacific.
It was not the first time
a Muslim soldier had killed his Christian counterparts.
In military and civilian
courts it has been shown that Muslims sometimes get special treatment, at least
from journalists.
"Any analysis of what happened should begin with noting American soldiers are required by military to report war crimes."
ReplyDeleteI've did not know this particularly vital piece of information. This bears repeating. Particularly to all the people who so facilely use the word "traitor."